RAD 140 VS LGD 4033 | Comparing Suppression, Gains And Strength

Both of these SARMs deserve a lot of respect.

You can’t just jump in and start using them without any experience or forethought, that would be ludicrous.

RAD 140 vs LGD 4033

I have had the honor to try both of them and today, I will be showing you the difference between these two SARMs, as well as their strengths and weaknesses.

RAD 140 (Testostelone)

Testolone is a research drug that enjoys the highest anabolic to androgenic ration of 90:1 amongst all the other SARMs.

As of now, there are no human trials published on RAD 140, but there is one on-going study concerning itself with Testolone and women with breast cancer that started in 2017 and should end by 2020. 

Research has shown that even a very low dosage of RAD 140 can produce marvelous results, so I’m curious to see how LGD 4033 stacks up to this.

If you’re interested in reading my entire guide on Testolone, just click here.

LGD 4033 (Ligandrol)

LGD 4033 is a SARM known for being a full agonist of the androgen receptor. It is very suppressive, and one has to be careful with dosages.

Just like RAD 140, Ligandrol has shown itself to be highly effective in low dosages. 

There are currently three human trials published with Ligandrol and all of them show that the SARM is tolerated quite well in human subjects, even in dosages as high as 22mgs a day.

Ligandrol has entered phase II trials and it keeps mesmerizing scientists with the awesome results it procures.

Want to learn more about LGD-4033? Just follow this link.

RAD 140 VS LGD 4033 – Half-Life

New studies show that RAD 140 has a half-life of sixty hours, which means that it takes about two and a half days for concentrations in the blood to fall below 50%.

On the other side of the coin, Ligandrol enjoys a half-life between 24 to 36 hours.

This means that you’ll only have to take these two SARMs once a day while on cycle.

RAD 140 VS LGD 4033 – Benefits

Both of these SARMs harbor a lot of benefits and I’ll let you know about the differences in potency between these two research chemicals.

Muscle Mass

I gained around three more pounds of muscle mass with Ligandrol in comparison to Testolone. However, the muscle gained from RAD 140 felt a lot sturdier to the touch, which is something you should consider when choosing between the two SARMs.


Ligandrol takes the cake on this one, as I felt like a million bucks in the gym and just wanted to keep on going, without ever stopping. RAD 140 had similar effects, but it was far less pronounced.


RAD 140 wins this one. It gave me insane strength and my pumps went through the roof. I never felt as powerful before, the feeling is simply beyond words.

On the other hand, Ligandrol also gave me strength, but without nearly as much potency when compared to RAD 140.

Recovery Times

Ligandrol gave me much shorter recovery times and I felt like I could go to the gym six to seven times a week without a problem. I think that every bodybuilder out there has to eventually have a taste of Ligandrol to just see how much different your body works while on a performance-enhancing drug. 

RAD 140 didn’t have the same effect, but I still felt more rested in the mornings.


Motivation was definitely higher while on RAD 140. The insane amount of strength that it gives you makes you just want to lift more and more. Almost every time you come to the gym, you break a personal record, which just makes you even more motivated to keep lifting. The feeling is just crazy.

Fat Loss

Another point for RAD 140. The fat loss is just way more pronounced while you’re on it in comparison to LGD 4033. I think I lost around 5% of my total body fat while on RAD 140, even though I was eating way more than my maintenance.

I actually gained an insignificant amount of body fat (0,5%) while on Ligandrol, as I’ve put on quite a bit of weight while on it.


Vascularity was way more pronounced while I was on RAD 140. I remember the strong pumps as if it were yesterday and my hands looking like two machines ready to destroy anyone and anything in their path. The fat loss properties of RAD 140 definitely helped with vascularity, which is another point you should consider.

RAD 140 VS LGD 4033 – Side Effects

Side effects were definitely present with both of these compounds, some more than others. Let’s take a look at how they manifested and at what intensity.


This is the big question on everyone’s minds – what were the differences in suppression between the two SARMs?

Ligandrol managed to suppress me on just a 2,5mg dosage per day. It was mild suppression and I didn’t require PCT, but I felt lethargy, and my libido levels plummeted.

Keep in mind that I took 10mgs of Testolone per day and that it suppressed me a lot more than Ligandrol. 

I even considered giving up my cycle while on RAD 140; it did become a bit unbearable, but I managed to pull through.

I didn’t use PCT for RAD 140 and it took a bit longer for the suppression to subside in comparison to Ligandrol.


I felt irritable and snappy while on RAD 140, every little thing bothered me. At that time, I thought that my life had become a lot more stressful for reasons unknown to me, but it turned out that Testolone was the culprit all along.

I didn’t have any problems with aggression or irritability while on Ligandrol.

Joint Pain

I have to admit that my joints did start hurting a bit once I put on some muscle with RAD 140.

Even though I had gained a lot more muscle mass while on Ligandrol, I didn’t feel any joint pain, which is probably due to the soothing effects LGD 4033 has on our bones.

Water Retention

I didn’t experience it on neither of these two compounds, but just be aware that you’re far more likely to have it while using Ligandrol.

I didn’t feel any other side effects while on these two SARMs. Some people will tell you that they’ve experienced far worse side effects, but it’s a big question whether they used real SARMs or stuff laced with prohormones.

RAD 140 VS LGD 4033 - Results

Ligandrol seems to be better when gaining and building muscle mass is concerned, while RAD 140 wins when it comes to the strength of the muscle itself.

Also, RAD 140 gives far more power and better pumps in the gym. 

It also makes you lose fat, while Ligandrol fails to impress in that department.

On the flip side, Ligandrol excels at giving you an extra push in the gym and providing you with lowered recovery times.

As you can see, both of these compounds have their strengths and weaknesses and it’s hard to really crown a winner between the two.

RAD 140 VS LGD 4033 – Pricing

I usually don’t like to talk about the amount of money one has to spend when getting SARMs. 

However, I can understand that some of you are on a tight budget and for that reason, I have to say that Ligandrol is far cheaper when compared to RAD 140.

LGD 4033 is the budget-friendly option amongst the two, as you save an average of 20$ when purchasing it from my recommended stores.


All in all, both of these SARMs are strong contenders and do their job as described.

If you’re after more muscle mass, decreased recovery times and weight gain, take Ligandrol.

If you want a shredded look, with low body fat and a lot of vascularity, RAD 140 should be your pick.

Don’t forget to take these two compounds in low dosages as to avoid having to do PCT.

Good luck and have fun!

more insights

Want to learn more about SARMs and other research chemicals?​

Join our community to get a free SARMs handbook!