SARMs VS TRT | Which One Is Better?

There’s a lot of heated debate going on when SARMs and TRT are concerned.


Some people claim TRT to be the better option, while others are lauding the safety potential of SARMs, giving them the edge.

Although this is a site dedicated to SARMs, I will do my best to present both sides impartially.

SARMs VS TRT | Availability

I would like to point out that no sane doctor out there will prescribe SARMs to you; you will have to get them through alternative means.

This equates to buying them over the counter on the internet, where anyone can peddle anything to you.

Luckily, we’re no longer in the wild west of the web and there are vendors out there where you can buy SARMs safely and securely.

I will show you those places at the end of this article.

If you suffer from testosterone deficiency, your doctor will most likely try to apply lifestyle changes to your situation and see how it pans out.

If that doesn’t work, testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) is a viable option.

Contrary to popular belief, you don’t necessarily have to inject testosterone directly into your bloodstream.

There are other options available, such as mouth or skin patches that consistently administer testosterone to your body throughout the day.

I would have to give both SARMs and TRT a point in this department, although I do prefer SARMs as you don’t have to go through an intermediary (your doctor).

SARMs VS TRT | Benefits

Many people overplay the strength of SARMs, daring to compare them to actual testosterone.

Let me tell you one thing; nothing, except for anabolic steroids, compares to actual testosterone being administered to your body.

This means that TRT will show more benefits, such as increased libido, muscle mass, strength and so on.

On the other hand, SARMs improve the above as well but they aren’t as potent as actual testosterone, which is what you get with TRT.

TRT definitely takes home the bacon in this one.

SARMs VS TRT | Side Effects

This is going to sound very controversial coming from my mouth but according to the data, side effects are similar across both SARMs and TRT.

This means that although SARMs are apparently “selective” in their mechanism, they still exhibit side effects and risks associated with actual testosterone.

The reason why this happens is because people imbue SARMs like they’re candy, essentially overdosing on them, causing unnecessary side effects.

What does this mean for the average person?

It suggests that it might be safer to listen to your doctor and administer testosterone in a controlled environment, compared to imbuing SARMs off of some site.

The problem with SARMs is that some of them, like RAD140 and S23, are untested on humans.

This means that it’s hard to gouge a safe and effective dosage; you’re essentially left to experiment on your own body.

From what I’ve gathered through countless anecdotal reports; SARMs are often used in dosages much higher than recommended, leading to side effects.

One reason for that is the apparent impatience of many frustrated users, who are just looking for a way to rev up their testosterone levels.

However, when SARMs are used in a controlled environment, they are much safer compared to TRT.

The problem with TRT is that it can cause prostate cancer, gyno, cardiovascular problems, liver issues and so on.

To conclude, SARMs are a bit safer than TRT, provided you use them in recommended dosages.

If I were you, I would opt for TRT under medical supervision from a health professional but understandably, that’s not everyone’s cup of tea.


If your insurance isn’t covering it and it’s very likely it won’t, TRT proves to be more costly than SARMs.

The average user spends around 100$ per month on SARMs and other ancillaries.

This might seem like a lot but when you break down the cost on a daily basis, it’s less than 4$ per day.

On the other hand, TRT will cost you up to 1000$ per month and let’s not forget all the other medical fees incurred by your doctor.

However, if you manage to convince your insurance company to approve you for TRT, you will have a much safer experience, as you’re under medical supervision.

All in all, SARMs are the cheaper option but if you have the means, go for TRT as it’s the safer option.

SARMs VS TRT | Research

Pure testosterone has been discovered way before SARMs and it’s only natural that it has more research backing it up.

The same thing goes for steroids but just because they enjoy seniority doesn’t necessarily mean you should be taking them.

My point is, SARMs are still in a nascent state and over the years, we can expect a lot of research to come to fruition.

The same couldn’t be said for TRT, where everything has already been discovered.

Basically, TRT has more research under its belt but SARMs are still being studied and we’re getting access to new data on a monthly basis.

My verdict is that SARMs will eventually come to replace TRT but it will take a while.


Both SARMs and TRT are good choices for men deficient in testosterone.

If you have the option of voting with your dollar, definitely go for TRT, as nothing can replace medical supervision and actual testosterone.

Understandably, not many men can afford to pay up to 1000$ per month and that’s why you should visit my recommended companies for the best SARMs!

more insights

Want to learn more about SARMs and other research chemicals?​

Join our community to get a free SARMs handbook!